Court of Justice of the European Union fines two member states for AML failings

The Court of Justice of the European Union today fined Romania EUR 3 million & Ireland EUR 2 million for failure to transpose in full the fourth money laundering directive and for failing to notify the European Commission of the transposition measures that they had undertook. Here is what happened Nine other EU27 Member States are still subject to infringement procedures Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands are now to be referred to the CJEU for incomplete transposition of the directive Six other Member States are at stage one or two of EU infringement procedures What we think about it Here at Lysis, we remain sceptical of the EU plans both for the European Banking Authority’s new role as an anti-money laundering (AML) ‘supervisor of supervisors’ and the further ambitious plan for a central pan-EU27 AML regulator.

Compliance with the existing AML regime at the Member State level appears largely optional and the fines imposed are ludicrously microscopic compared to each country’s GDP. As the UK seeks ‘equivalence’ rulings on AML matters, the EU statements are increasingly absurd – 'Prime Minister Johnson agreed, in paragraph 82 of the Political Declaration that our agreement should cover anti-money laundering and counter terrorism financing. We are very far from this objective.’ Michel Barnier 5 June 2020 The fines imposed on Romania and Ireland were made for technical non-compliance (a rules-based box ticking exercise). The EU fails to take risk-based action on AML issues despite the Danske Bank EUR 200 billion money laundering fiasco. On 13 March 2020 Valdis Dombrovskis wrote to the UK Chancellor in astonishing and dismissive terms – ‘We are mapping the equivalence areas internally, and my teams will reach out to yours soon to collect evidence about the UK frameworks applying after the transition period, in line with our existing practice on equivalence assessments. I note that equivalence assessment will have to be forward-looking, taking into account of overall developments, including any divergences of UK rules from EU rules.’ The UK is and always has been wholly compliant with EU requirements (and international norms) with respect to AML. The latest Status Report In case you missed it We published an article last week highlighting how Romania & Ireland were already in proceedings before the CJEU for incomplete transposition of the directive. Have a read for yourself here. Written by Tom Griffiths Associate Director at Lysis Group Notes: EU infringement procedure Click here to find out more Formal notice Reasoned opinion Proceedings before the CJEU Other infringement proceedings

There are still inflight proceedings against these Member States for failure to notify transposition of the fourth money laundering directive. Implementation Timetable by Article 67 of the fourth money laundering directive 26 June 2017 - Implementation of fourth money laundering directive except 10 January 2020 - Corporate BO register [Art 30] 10 March 2020 - Trust BO register [Art 31] 10 July 2020 - Requirements for anonymous third country prepaid cards [Art 12(3)] 10 September - 2020 European Central Platform [Art 32a] 10 March 2021 - Member State interconnectivity of the centralised BO registers [Art 30-31] References Fourth money laundering directive consolidated text [EU 2015/849 amended by 2018/843] UK Chancellor of the Exchequer to the European Commission 27 February 2020 European Commission to the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer 13 March 2020 Anti-money laundering directive IV (AMLD IV) - transposition status 2 June 2020 Michel Barnier speech 5 June 2020 EC press release 2 July 2020 EC July infringement package: key decisions 2 July 2020 Financial Times 3 July 2020 Court of Justice of the European Union PRESS RELEASE No 92/20 Luxembourg, 16 July 2020

More Posts
Browse all Posts

Offices across the globe.